Botanical Latin
Lesson 7 - Comparative and Superlative Degrees of Adjectives


a project of
V. F. Thomas Co. - P. O. Box 84 - Hulls Cove, Maine  04644
info@vfthomas.com

(updated 30 April 2023)

In lesson 4 you learned about Group A adjectives, and in lesson 6 you learned about group B adjectives. Some of the adjectives you have learned describe an object as small (parvus, -a, -um) or thick (crassus, -a, -um) or short (brevis, -is, -e) or tall (grandis, -is, -e). They tell something about an object but do it in isolation from similar objects. This is the positive degree of an adjective and is the form learned when studying the vocabulary.

Comparative degree. Occasionally in botanical Latin descriptions, you may wish to compare some feature, length for example, of two structures and say that one is longer than the other or that one is shorter than the other. “Longer” is the comparative degree of the adjective “long” and “shorter” is the comparative degree of “short”.

To form the comparative degree of either a group A or a group B adjective—they are formed in the same way— first, determine the stem of the adjective, which is done by dropping the genitive singular ending. Then, add the endings below (see tables 7.1, 7.2, and 7.3).


Table 7.1 - formation of the comparative degree of an adjective
positive degree comparative degree - masculine and feminine comparative degree - neuter
learned from vocabulary stem of positive degree + ior stem of positive degree + ius
group A parvus, -a, -um parv + ior
(genitive singular: parvioris)
parv + ius
(genitive singular: parvioris)
group B brevis, -is, -e brev + ior
(genitive singular: brevioris)
brev + ius
(genitive singular: brevioris)


Note that the endings given below are non-I-stem endings. That is, the genitive plural ends in -um (not -ium), the nominative plural of the neuter ends in -a (not -ia), and the ablative singular of the neuter ends in e (not i). Also note that the comparative degree endings for group A adjectives are identical to those for group B.


Table 7.2 - singular comparative degree of parvus (small; group A) and brevis (short; group B).
case masculine and feminine neuter
nominative parvior, brevior parvius, brevius
genitive parvioris, brevioris parvioris, brevioris
dative parviori, breviori parviori, breviori
accusative parviorem, breviorem parvius, brevius
ablative parviore, breviore parviore, breviore


Table 7.3 - plural comparative degree of parvus and brevis. Again, note that the comparative degree endings for group A adjectives are identical to those for group B.
case masculine and feminine neuter
nominative parviores, breviores parviora, breviora
genitive parviorum, breviorum parviorum, breviorum
dative parvioribus, brevioribus parvioribus, brevioribus
accusative parviores, breviores parviora, breviora
ablative parvioribus, brevioribus parvioribus, brevioribus

Translation of comparative degree    In addtion to translating the comparative degree with an ending of “-er” (longer, for example; used generally with features described by one syllable [“long” in this case]), the words “more” (for example., more pubescent) or “rather” (for example, rather branched) may be used.



Superlative degree. When you compare a measurable feature (e.g., length) of three or more plants, you may describe one as being the longest and another as the shortest. “Longest” is the superlative degree of “long”, and “shortest” is the superlative degree of “short”. As with the comparative degree, there is no difference between the superlative endings for group A adjective and those for group B.

Table 7.4 - formation of superlative degree of an adjective.
positive degree superlative degree - masculine superlative degree - feminine superlative degree - neuter
learned from vocabulary stem of positive degree + issimus stem of positive degree + issima stem of positive degree + issimum
group A longus, -a, -um long + issimus long + issima long + issimum
group B brevis, -is, -e brev + issimus brev + issima brev + issimum

Note that the endings given below are the same as group A adjectives (i.e., first and second declension endings). Also note that the comparative degree endings for group A adjectives are identical to those for group B.

Table 7.5 - singular superlative degree of longus (long; group A) and brevis (short; group B).
case masculine feminine neuter
nominative longissimus, brevissimus longissima, brevissima longissimum, brevissimum
genitive longissimi, brevissimi longissimae, brevissimae longissimi, brevissimi
dative longissimo, brevissimo longissimae, brevissimae longissimo, brevissimo
accusative longissimum, brevissimum longissimam, brevissimam longissimum, brevissimum
ablative longissimo, brevissimo longissimae, brevissimae longissimo, brevissimo


Table 7.6 - plural xuperlative degree of longus and brevis. Again, note that the superlative degree endings for group A adjectives are identical to those for group B.
case masculine feminine neuter
nominative longissimi, brevissimi longissimae, brevissimae longissima, brevissima
genitive longissimorum, brevissimorum longissimarum, brevissimarum longissimorum, brevissimorum
dative longissimis, brevissimis longissimis, brevissimis longissimis, brevissimis
accusative longissimos, brevissimos longissimas, brevissimas longissima, brevissima
ablative longissimis, brevissimis longissimis, brevissimis longissimis, brevissimis


Vocabulary {text}.

{?} {?} {?}

Translation of superlative degree    In addtion to translating the superlative degree with an ending of “-est” (longest, for example; used generally with features described by one syllable [“long” in this case]), the words “most” (for example., most shiny), “very” (for example, very branched), or “quite” (for example, quite viscid) may be used.



Latin Descriptions and Diagnoses
{text}.

Exercises
Translate the following into English.
   1.
   2.
   3.
   4.
   5.
   6.
   7.
   8.
   9.
   10.

Write the following in Latin.
   1.
   2.
   3.
   4.
   5.
   6.
   7.
   8.
   9.
   10.

Write a Latin description for the following. These are more challenging. You have to convey the meaning rather than following the exact wording.
   1.
   2.